Welcome to SECApedia! Please check out our rules, manual of style aswell as some info on the site.


The site is currently in a "grace period" where only users can edit articles so that we can set things up in peace. This should end within a few days or so. Soyoyuki (talk) 14:22, 21 June 2026 (UTC)


CURRENT MISSION: Update, uncensor and (if needed) rewrite all the imported pages from SNCApedia.
Additionally, please remove all unnecessary discussion pages, for example those with outdated info.

Talk:Averi.foo

From SECApedia
Latest comment: 6 June by Yaquer200 in topic Vooey Cuckjeet
Jump to navigationJump to search

opinion

i thought this shit was shitty but i was wrong

clearly fooeypedos like marketpliers and slvtforbibisi hate them (including other furcorders) SomebodyRum (talk) 13:09, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

nigga did you even read the article, even though It is a furfag site the vooey is agaisnt anything degenerate, mp and north dont like It because its "rulecucked" and this comes as a no shit because mp and north are faggots who like to erp or post porn on the 'ru, as for slvt4bibisi he always hated moralfags and he IS a janny on the fooey so its obvious slvt4bibisi would hate them. Yaquer200 (talk) 16:06, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
i know, i'm just saying that the furcorders were claiming to be vooey users but its obvious they originate from the fooey. SomebodyRum (talk) 16:09, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
it's just a lie, they say it so they look good but in reality none of the things they like they can do it there, and they can't pull up the excuse "its bait" because they were doing this shit for hours on private.
i'm glad the that shithole is shutting down soon, i doubt any rapefugee crisis happens anyways. Yaquer200 (talk) 16:22, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
They will keep repeating that it was "a bait to own le HTSM nusois" until the day they die. Because faggots are uneable to accept accountability and from their position of power, they're also uneable to accept that their degeneracy is incompatible with the values users used to have. They will claim it was ironic until being a gooner becomes fully accepted in the Quotesphere (which seems to be the case, specially on the 'ru), when that happens then they're gonna pull some historical revisionism to claim that the Sharty was always like that (while it's more of a back-and-forth), but until then, it would just be "baiting the nusois" (ev&oe baiters themselves are Xitter immigrants). The modern Sharty user acts more akin to the Jarty boogeyman BurgerFlipper (talk) 16:32, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
mind you trannyplier was a "anti-degenerate" furry, turns out this nigger was a fooeypedo who browses a pedophile zoophile porn site,
and has admit multiple time in the leak to be a "dedicated connoisseur"
the fact he was flaunting his doxxing skill, then it turns out to be false,
then also sent porn to a minor,
no wonder why soywikicuck are all projecting faggots who want to take down sncapedia SomebodyRum (talk) 16:38, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
>mind you trannyplier was a "anti-degenerate" furry, turns out this nigger was a fooeypedo who browses a pedophile zoophile porn site,
I absolutely forgot about that part. Nobaldi was surprised by any of this either. I had seen him accept soyporn on the 'ru (which is hidden by the default filters) and also make the claim that "soyporn is sharty culture" on the Nuuru (as usual later claiming it was "bait" because they're broken records), additionally according to their own sources most furries are gooners and same goes for trannies. I've seen members of the Furcord defending themselves through either projection or "not me bro I swear" and in some cases "but I watch straight porn" (they're still admitting to jerk off to animals and this doesn't make them less of a gooner).
I'm also very skeptical about the Vooeys being anti-porn, however I grant them that at least they fight back instead of attempting to normalize it within the Soysphere BurgerFlipper (talk) 16:48, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
> They will claim it was ironic until being a gooner becomes fully accepted in the Quotesphere (which seems to be the case, specially on the 'ru), when that happens then they're gonna pull some historical revisionism to claim that the Sharty was always like that
I mean it kinda was, but not at the extent you had this many fucking people doing so many detailed pornography.
>The modern Sharty user acts more akin to the Jarty boogeyman
I always forget why it even became a boogeyman, the jarty had a weird moral compass, whilst they hated on 'corders and other things that kuz brought like doxing they also were 100% okay with gore and many other edgy things the sharty had also at the time.
>mind you trannyplier was a "anti-degenerate" furry
everyone forgot about this, the people who i see that behave like this aren't usually the baitranny type, examples like this are the vooey, the people that crosspost between both sites i often see they aren't the usual baitranny type, or they don't bait that much at all or attentionwhore this much.
>I'm also very skeptical about the Vooeys being anti-porn
I mean i've visited it a few times, i havent seen anything about porn on it and their namefags and recurrent users are normal compared to the average furfag.
mind you that trannypliers and north stopped using it because "it was too rulecucked" and they were doing vile shit on the 'ru GC. Yaquer200 (talk) 16:58, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
>I mean it kinda was, but not at the extent you had this many fucking people doing so many detailed pornography.
I'm aware, that's why I said it was more of a back-and-forth with some periods being less degenerate while others are more degenerate (such as the current one)
>I mean i've visited it a few times, i havent seen anything about porn on it and their namefags and recurrent users are normal compared to the average furfag.
My skepticism comes that it is very easy to make claims but the reality be another one, however since most are anonymous this is impossible to confirm or deny, so it's more of a bias from my side than a claim based on events. Again I grant them that despite it being likely that many of them are still porn addicts, at least they recognize it as wrong (which seems to be too hard for the Quotesphere furfaggots).
>mind you that trannypliers and north stopped using it because "it was too rulecucked" and they were doing vile shit on the 'ru GC.
I remember they were accused of being Fooeyfags but they denied it, until LimenAIDs (a brony) got kicked out and they were allowed to document splinters, where what they denied at first now was confirmed.
>mind you that trannypliers and north stopped using it because "it was too rulecucked"
To them it's always "unjustified rulecucking" when they're not the ones enforcing the rules.
>Mfw the Quotecord is friendlier to gooner niggerhells than to better moderated sites BurgerFlipper (talk) 17:09, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
>My skepticism comes that it is very easy to make claims but the reality be another one
i cannot go inside the minds of every single vooeyfag but the site has a straight path it wants to go and any of the people that don't follow get left behind.
>>Mfw the Quotecord is friendlier to gooner niggerhells than to better moderated sites
My main concern with the fooey is the fishy administration it has, defenitly something else is hiding beneath, i've discuss it later but check the fooeycord page.
I also wonder why it was allowed not only it is a splinter made by someone who was mad at the sharty for getting rid of the furfag board but also made by a cordnigger and someone who allowed kuzzyfags on his site which in the eyes of quotecord is le bad. Yaquer200 (talk) 17:20, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
>I always forget why it even became a boogeyman, the jarty had a weird moral compass, whilst they hated on 'corders and other things that kuz brought like doxing they also were 100% okay with gore and many other edgy things the sharty had also at the time.
When the average Nusoi and newGOD arrived the Jarty was long dead, so it has remained as a meme and since many of them also are not aware of the amount of censorship on the site they think "pipo who use splinters must be 'nished pedohs" because that's what the 'ki told them. I do see the Quotecord (and Quotegolem bootlickers) wanting to turn the Swinny and SNCApedians into a new boogeyman BurgerFlipper (talk) 17:22, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
I don't deny that the Swinny has a problem of Sharty users joining just to metawhine, I also don't deny the existence of actual HTSM (I'm aware the meme was forced, but there are some legitimate uses). But it does feel like the true current boogeyman is le "HTSM nusois", since they use it as label to anyone who dares to critize the administration BurgerFlipper (talk) 17:27, 31 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Vooey Cuckjeet

I'm sorry nigga but can I make this guy his own page? I'm genuinely dying of laughter lurking these threads. Morrissey (talk)

>SNCApedia is a wiki for the broader Soysphere
Ofc you can make a page about it, don't even ask next time Yaquer200 (talk) 13:51, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I just don't want to shit up your 'ki. Morrissey (talk)
use reply button btw, this doesn't bother me doe and it doesn't "shit up" this site Yaquer200 (talk) 14:05, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply