Welcome to SECApedia! Please check out our rules, manual of style aswell as some info on the site.
The site is currently in a "grace period" where only users can edit articles so that we can set things up in peace. This should end within a few days or so. Soyoyuki (talk) 14:22, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
CURRENT MISSION: Update, uncensor and (if needed) rewrite all the imported pages from SNCApedia.
Additionally, please remove all unnecessary discussion pages, for example those with outdated info.
Wikipedia

You can help by fact checking everything before ordering 'za to xis house
| Wikipedia | |
|---|---|
| Born | Jan 15 2001 |
| Status | Active |
| Best known for | Being the largest wikipedia and being rulecucked. |
| IAS? | No |
| Website | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page |
Wikipedia is a wiki site full of trannies and retards that documents every little snca event of this world. It’s known to be a really rulecucked wiki (no crap, it’s neutral and it can’t be biased nigger <- just look at any lgbt-related or political article). They had a page about the sharty but it was deleted for not fitting the notability criteria. It is also one of the largest websites on planet earth, and by far the largest wiki. Despite claiming to be unbiased, it is one of the most rulecucked and terrible websites on earth, and most of the jannies are either libtards with a passion or trannies. They consider even the mildest things “hate symbols”, like Pepe the Frog and Feraljak, and are extremely selective when it comes to pages on random shit. Sure, you can have a page on mining in the Kamchatka peninsula in 1814, but a page on Soyjak.party, arguably the most influential imageboard of the 2020s?. Nope, too incelpilled. What a fucking joke.
Despite what your English teacher says[Meds NOW, even teachers say don't use dickipedia for sourcing your serious hat SNCA essay], this website is one of the most biased and rulecucked shitholes on planet earth and if a page isn’t extremely biased, it’s usually some SNCA bullshit about scientists in Murmica or something.
The founder of Wikipedia, Jimbo Wales, ran a porn website
before founding Wikipedia.org. This should tell you a lot about Wikipedia, and it's users.
Weird rules
- Pages can’t be biased (unless it’s on right wing chuddies and faschies like Hitler or J.K Rowling, get it right you stupid little fuck). As a result, the phrase “best known for” is banned, although there is a large portion of Wikipedia with that section.
- No swear words unless for documentation purposes
- Anyone can edit the site (which means it’s easy to troll)
- Neo-Nazi chud websites are not allowed articles unless it’s shit like 4chan (which isn’t even a neo-nazi chud website, it’s just a anime porn website that’s only notable in the ‘sphere for kicking off soyposting)
- Conservatives are allowed, but are heavily restricted.
- Images have to be used to represent something, even if the article is on shit like pornography or dead nigger babies. There was even briefly what can be considered CP on Wikipedia in 2008. Wikipedians tried to defend themselves by stating that it was a “album cover” for an obscure metal album, but the file was forced to be deleted. Even if the intent was not pedophilia, it still seems unusual how a completely naked baby is used for an album cover.
- If a topic is notable enough, it gets an article. Wikipedians are very contradictory about articles, and stuff like Chris Chan and Soyjak.party don’t have articles, but shit about literal who kinesio-murdade-archaolopologists from Bangladesh get articles
- Chris Chan, Allatra, and Lolcow.farm are the only three banned articles on Wikipedia.
