CURRENT MISSION: Update, uncensor and (if needed) rewrite all the imported pages from SNCApedia.
Additionally, please tag all unnecessary discussion pages with the {{Delete}} template, for example those with outdated info.
For the love of god, please only mark your articles with {{WIP}} if you actually intend to finish them. Just look at how many there are in the WIP category.


Tether is currently on a break until the 16th of July. Please contact me for any and all things regarding SECApedia. Soyoyuki (talk) 01:36, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
You may still submit your janitor/approver application, but you wont get anywhere if you arent already autoconfirmed.


The community rules have been slightly updated, with the mention of "No-Link" sites.This is also mentioned & explained in rule 9.2
soygem.party and jarty.party have been moved out of the Gray Area and into the Friendly Zone.


The file size upload limit has FINALLY been increased to 8 megabytes. Sorry saars.

Talk:SNCApedia (detractor perspective)

From SECApedia
Revision as of 10:03, 31 March 2026 by 192.227.130.194 (talk)

Latest comment: 31 March by 192.227.130.194 in topic >delet dis cuz not needed!!!!!!
Jump to navigationJump to search

Delte, youknow why

no, i dont know why, why?

coalfarmer is a leaky nigger who can't come up with a valid reason to delete this page 2A0D:BBC7:0:0:F816:3EFF:FE18:F410 00:23, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
>it's afraid

>delet dis cuz not needed!!!!!!

I'm sure as shit that "Article (alternative perspective)" is a trending joke (or sometimes truth nukes) in the big 'ki, so I don't see harm in having this article here. Why else it has thrembillions of Kuz articles in under different perspectives?
It's also related to this 'pedia after all, so why even delete it? It's not "too SNCA". Nothing is not too SNCA, not even mangoes. There's a reason why the Template:Delete exists, to DISCUSS why it should be deleted in the first place. [Clarification needed] (talk) 01:43, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Editor, I need reasons on why you even deleted it in the first place.
@Coalfarmer, For a guy that wanted the 'ki to be fun, surely you don't like fun in here as well so you need to explain as well.
I understand that you both have hate boners for how the big 'ki is (shittily) being administrated, but both of you don't have to clittyleak over an ounce of criticism towards the 'pedia. We're not perfect after all, but at least we're trying to be informative of what the big 'ki is censoring. [Clarification needed] (talk) 02:04, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Coalfarmer @Editor stop being so much of clitty leakers.
This page should stay. Yaquer200 (talk) 07:18, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
My clitty is free of leakage. Coalfarmer (talk) 07:32, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

>Retarded and unneeded, made by an underage leaky faggot. Sounds like a way to describe this entire site. Lol. 192.227.130.194 10:03, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

test

there's something wrong i'm not sure whether it's my browser settings or mediawiki in general. Like I can't edit any wiki that uses mediawiki 149.36.51.7 06:42, 31 March 2026 (UTC)Reply