CURRENT MISSION: Update, uncensor and (if needed) rewrite all the imported pages from SNCApedia.
Additionally, please tag all unnecessary discussion pages with the {{Delete}} template, for example those with outdated info.
For the love of god, please only mark your articles with {{WIP}} if you actually intend to finish them. Just look at how many there are in the WIP category.
Tether is currently on a break until the 16th of July. Please contact me for any and all things regarding SECApedia. Soyoyuki (talk) 01:36, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
You may still submit your janitor/approver application, but you wont get anywhere if you arent already autoconfirmed.
The community rules have been slightly updated, with the mention of "No-Link" sites.This is also mentioned & explained in rule 9.2
soygem.party and jarty.party have been moved out of the Gray Area and into the Friendly Zone.
The file size upload limit has FINALLY been increased to 8 megabytes. Sorry saars.
Chinny/Coalfarmer's Ban Controversy: Difference between revisions
WABAGjanitor (talk | contribs) Created page with "{{Swinny}} {{SECApedia}} {{Infobox conflict |conflict=Approvers' Revolt |image=File:Screenshot 2026-06-29 041553.png |date=June 29, 2026 |place=SECApedia |result=Chinny censorship reversed *Approvers' griefing attempt success but quickly reverted *All two involved approvers demoted or resigned |combatant1=SECApedia Janitors<br>''Leaking SECApedians'' frameless|20px |combatant2=Renegade Approvers<br>''Hunky Swines'' File:Hu..." |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Swinny}} | {{Swinny}} | ||
{{SECApedia}} | {{SECApedia}} | ||
{{Infobox conflict | {{Infobox conflict | ||
|conflict=Approvers' Revolt | |conflict=Approvers' Revolt | ||
| Line 7: | Line 6: | ||
|date=June 29, 2026 | |date=June 29, 2026 | ||
|place=[[SECApedia]] | |place=[[SECApedia]] | ||
|result= | |result=[[SECApedia:Rules#Community Rules|Community rules]] updated. | ||
|combatant1=[[File:Not so calmed SECApedian.png|frameless|20px]] Leaking SECApedians | |||
|combatant2=[[File:Hunkylars.png|frameless|20px]] Hunky Swines | |||
|combatant1= | |commander1=[[User:Soyoyuki|soyoyuki]]<br>[[File:Shit everybody cares about enthusiast.png|frameless|20px]] Unpaid SECApedia Janitors | ||
|combatant2= | |commander2=[[File:Impish soyak 121434532423.png|frameless|20px]] [[User:Cobgang]]<br>[[File:Impish soyak 121434532423.png|frameless|20px]] [[User:GUN]] | ||
|commander1=[[File:Shit everybody cares about enthusiast.png|frameless|20px]] Unpaid SECApedia Janitors | |casualties1=Xheir clitties | ||
|commander2=[[File:Impish soyak 121434532423.png|frameless|20px]] [[User:Cobgang]] | |casualties2=2 demotions & one 1 day ban | ||
[[File:Impish soyak 121434532423.png|frameless|20px]] [[User:GUN]] | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{ | {{Notastub}}{{CoalShort|1=The Chinny/Coalfarmer's Ban Controversy is {{Coaltext|'''coal.'''}}}} | ||
{{CoalShort|1=The Chinny/Coalfarmer's Ban Controversy is {{Coaltext|'''coal.'''}}}} | On June 29, 2026, a thread in [[Swinny]]'s /asg/ warned users that "coalfarmer" was being automoderated.{{CitationNeeded|this thread just existed, okay? there are no archives}} The warning sparked significant outrage in the thread, and the discussion quickly shifted to the censorship of the [[Chinny]].<br> | ||
Users argued that it should be banned from the SECApedia due to degeneracy and pedophilia. After debating with the janitors, they decided to demoralize the wiki. | |||
On June 29, 2026, a thread in [[Swinny]]'s /asg/ warned users that "coalfarmer" was being automoderated. The warning sparked significant outrage in the thread, | |||
and the discussion quickly shifted to the censorship of the [[Chinny]]. Users argued that it should be banned from the SECApedia due to degeneracy and pedophilia. After debating with the janitors, they decided to demoralize the wiki. | |||
Two notable approvers then began griefing the SECApedia. They made disruptive edits to the main page and censored the | Two notable approvers then began griefing the SECApedia. They made disruptive edits to the main page and censored the [[Chinny]]'s URL. This triggered a major conflict between the "hunky swines" and the unpaid SECApedia janitors. In the aftermath, all two approvers were either demoted or resigned | ||
== Community Rules Poll == | |||
Just as the swinny /asg/ thread was {{Glow|[[ACCESS DENIED|mysteriously deleted]]}}, [[User:Soyoyuki|soyoyuki]] hosted a poll on whether to change the sites community rules.<br> | |||
Out of the 3 options (''pictured below''), the half-compromise option won in a landslide victory, which would slightly change the community rules. Unsurprisingly, only 3 people voted for the Full censor option. | |||
[[File:Poll resultsncaniggershitfling.PNG|thumb|left]] | |||
Latest revision as of 04:58, 30 June 2026
|
This topic refers to this very wiki. Here be shit everybody cares about. |
|
| Approvers' Revolt | |||
|---|---|---|---|
 | |||
| Date | June 29, 2026 | ||
| Location | SECApedia | ||
| Result | Community rules updated. | ||
| Belligerents | |||
| |||
| Commanders and leaders | |||
| |||
| Casualties and losses | |||
| |||
This article is not a stub. This is all there is to know about the subject.
The Chinny/Coalfarmer's Ban Controversy is coal.On June 29, 2026, a thread in Swinny's /asg/ warned users that "coalfarmer" was being automoderated.[this thread just existed, okay? there are no archives] The warning sparked significant outrage in the thread, and the discussion quickly shifted to the censorship of the Chinny.
Users argued that it should be banned from the SECApedia due to degeneracy and pedophilia. After debating with the janitors, they decided to demoralize the wiki.
Two notable approvers then began griefing the SECApedia. They made disruptive edits to the main page and censored the Chinny's URL. This triggered a major conflict between the "hunky swines" and the unpaid SECApedia janitors. In the aftermath, all two approvers were either demoted or resigned
Community Rules Poll
[edit | edit source]Just as the swinny /asg/ thread was mysteriously deleted, soyoyuki hosted a poll on whether to change the sites community rules.
Out of the 3 options (pictured below), the half-compromise option won in a landslide victory, which would slightly change the community rules. Unsurprisingly, only 3 people voted for the Full censor option.
