CURRENT MISSION: Update, uncensor and (if needed) rewrite all the imported pages from SNCApedia.
Additionally, please tag all unnecessary discussion pages with the {{Delete}} template, for example those with outdated info.
For the love of god, please only mark your articles with {{WIP}} if you actually intend to finish them. Just look at how many there are in the WIP category.


Tether is currently on a break until the 16th of July. Please contact me for any and all things regarding SECApedia. Soyoyuki (talk) 01:36, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
You may still submit your janitor/approver application, but you wont get anywhere if you arent already autoconfirmed.


The community rules have been slightly updated, with the mention of "No-Link" sites.This is also mentioned & explained in rule 9.2
soygem.party and jarty.party have been moved out of the Gray Area and into the Friendly Zone.


The file size upload limit has FINALLY been increased to 8 megabytes. Sorry saars.

Talk:Clarty

From SECApedia
Latest comment: 16 May by Brimstone in topic domain
Jump to navigationJump to search

domain

[edit source]

what is the point of censoring the domain here

the link is already present in all soyjak wiki articles related to foodists. I see no reason to censor their link Yoot (talk) 15:18, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

>the link is already present in all soyjak wiki articles related to foodists. I see no reason to censor their link

We have Kiwi Farms thread links that literally have the Clarty's domain name in it. We're not entirely censoring it but as a foodist website it feels unsafe to directly provide a link to the website even though it's dead, because someone else could squat it for other malicious purposes.
Alternativrly, what do we do about other hostile splinters that have been long shutdown like the Dwinny and NuSquarty? In my opinion only do not absolutely link them if the archives have 'P, for example the Spinny, but if it's an imageboard that has been completely shutdown and has zero redirects to anything and no archives have illegal content, maybe linking to it is fine until someone else domain squats it and its confirmed to be malicious. Maybe I'll experiment. Gemmy1488cob (talk) 16:22, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
everyone can squat any domain, no? on top of this some dwinny esque splinters have soylita/shoyta threads and pictures archived. I think linking the site is fine if it is already dead and no malicious content is present Yoot (talk) 16:32, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
This doesn’t really make sense, the site is dead and its successor is dead too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brimstone (talkcontribs)
why is this on the category "Banned" as far as i know the shiki never had an article on the clarty it was only briefly mentioned on the page about foodists Yaquer200 (talk) 19:26, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Because it’s banned here. Brimstone (Niggerhell) 19:35, 16 May 2026 (UTC)Reply